Recently they culled an entire thread because people were rightfully slating L&L over the Vernon rerelease, and now a legitimate question regarding library.com's rights/ethics in selling pdf's of manuscripts without permission...
Update: Here's the proof... do you see anything censor-worthy here? I haven't read an issue of Genii in years, but I'm betting Lybrary.com is an advertiser. The cretins.
10 comments:
I have just been informed that library.com has full page ads in Genii.
Why don't they just be honest about it and say "we do not allow negative comments about our advertisers."
Do Magic Makers have ads in Genii? Why was all the criticism of the Wesley James DVDs allowed to remain?
I think library.com's advertising is only part of it. Magic book publishing is a small world and I would not be surprised if Martin Breese would have ties with Kaufman and enough leverage to ask Genii's editor to remove the thread.
Sxn
Lybrary.com does NOT advertise in Genii magazine nor does it advertise on the Genii website. At least you should stick to the facts.
The fact is, I was INFORMED that lybrary.com has recently taken out full page ads in Genii
If they haven't then my information is dodgy. Nothing to do with distorting the facts.
I bet all of the people who comment here anonymously are the same folk who complain on the forums about me doing it...
Just musing...
If Lybrary and Breese do not advertise in Genii, why in the world censor such a benign post?
Very sad.
Lets see if lybrary.com ads start appearing in Genii in the next few months.
It's the only possible justification I can think of for censoring such a reasonable thread.
It could be that Kaufman just doesn't want to see any pro Sadowitz threads.
Kaufman despises Chris and Lybrary.
This is more likely about liability or Breese himself
And why is that? Kaufman doesn't like competition?
Post a Comment