If you haven't already read it, don't.
Although he does have a rant at Jerry Sadowitz (always welcome) regarding the "name a card triumph" that he allegedly pilfered. I haven't seen it so I can't give an informed opinion but, even from his own words, it does sound suspiciously like another micro-variation for the sake of publishing.
Anybody care to comment, what exactly did he contribute to the handling/effect?
3 comments:
"micro-variation for the sake of publishing" has been the trend in engineering research for quite some time... publish or perish is what they say ... i guess the same is going on here as well..
I believe he took away less shuffles and cuts from the original effect, though I'm not 100% sure. I recieved Gambit and didn;t like it too much either, although I do really like Ben Earl
I thought the magazine was awful.
Post a Comment